Non-interference · Arts. 99–101 · proposed internal function
Limits of competence
The Constitution defines technical authority affirmatively, but also states exactly where it ends. Infrastructure may not be used as a shortcut to alter a vote, judgment, record, currency, citizenship, property or norm.
Pre-Foundation · constitutional office not activatedConstitutional Proposal · reference text · not promulgated
The most important limit
An isolated technical credential does not produce a legal act reserved to a judge, electoral authority, Civil Registry, Central Bank, Treasury or other constitutional body. The system must be designed so that changing infrastructure does not amount to changing a judgment, vote, civil status, monetary issuance, legal title or normative publication.
When an order is unlawful
The Architect and administrators have a duty to refuse a command that requires tampering with a vote, judgment, record, balance, evidence, log, official publication or identity. Where there is substantial doubt about a critical institutional operation, the rule is to preserve the safe state, record the doubt and escalate it to the competent authority.
What the office cannot become
It cannot become governmental power, a legislative veto, a court, an electoral certifier, a monetary authority, owner of the Civil Registry or a mechanism for punishing people. Disagreement with a political or judicial decision does not authorise “correcting” the result through infrastructure.