decisions with patrimonial effect
Judicial events and assets
Freezing, adjudication, restitution, expropriation, recognition of ownership and other patrimonial decisions require a legal basis, proceedings and a verifiable registry event — not manual editing of the 3D world.
Due processNatural judge where requiredRegistry history preserved
A decision is not a graphics command
A judgment may recognise, restrict, transfer or order protection of a right within legal limits. Technical execution must record the legal origin of the event and update the competent source; it cannot turn administrative privileges into judicial power.
Preserve without finally deciding
Temporary measures must have an appropriate legal basis, scope and review.
Determine the legal effect
Recognition of ownership or another material effect depends on the competent court where the law reserves the matter to the judiciary.
Implement and preserve the chain
The responsible module records the event and retains sufficient provenance for audit.
Reflect, do not decide
Maps and 3D receive the resulting state; they are not where the judgment originates.
decision → registry effect
A judicial order must be translated into a precise legal effect
1Competent decisionIdentify the court, proceeding and scope of the order.
2Defined effectPreservation, restriction, freezing, transfer or another effect provided by law.
3Registry stateRecord the effect without erasing the previous state.
4Notice and appealRespect the defence and applicable avenues of review.
5Projections updatedThe map and 3D world reflect the outcome; they do not decide the outcome.
Justice in Candeia OSIt exists as a navigable institutional prototype. The current version contains no real proceedings or judicial orders to be applied to assets.
Property registerThe specific module does not yet exist in the current institutional set, so there is no operational registration of such effects at this stage.