Rendering is not title
An image may show “your house”, a map may highlight a parcel and a client may allow you to enter it. None of those actions replaces legal title or the competent registry event.


Four situations that must not be confused
That is an interface assertion. It must correspond to the state confirmed by the competent source.
That demonstrates technical control in a particular context; it does not by itself resolve a legal dispute.
The spatial cadastre does not replace the legal source of ownership.
Where the law gives it that effect, this is the relevant legal assertion, subject to correction and competent decision.
Four appearances that do not constitute title
Shows presence in the interface, not legal ownership.
It is interface state and must be reconcilable with the competent source.
It is a cartographic representation, not a registry entry.
A copy may be evidence, but possessing it does not rewrite the register.